When your business considers cloud infrastructure, you'll run into three terms: public cloud, private cloud, and hybrid cloud. These aren't marketing buzzwords that providers use interchangeably. They describe fundamentally different architectures, each with their own costs, risks, and suitability. This article explains the differences without the vague language.
Public cloud: shared infrastructure, large scale
With public cloud, your environment runs on infrastructure that a provider offers to multiple customers simultaneously. The big names are Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
The servers, network, and storage belong to the provider. You rent capacity. That capacity is virtually isolated from other customers, but multiple organisations share the underlying hardware. This is called multi-tenancy.
What this means in practice:
- You only pay for what you use (pay-as-you-go)
- Scaling is simple, adding more resources takes minutes
- No upfront investment in hardware
- Managing the underlying infrastructure is the provider's responsibility
The downside: you have limited control over where your data physically resides, which hardware you share with other customers, and how the provider handles government requests. That last point matters for companies that prefer not to factor in the CLOUD Act. American cloud providers fall under that law, even when their servers are in Europe.
Private cloud: your own environment, more control
With private cloud, you have a cloud environment exclusively for your organisation. This can work in two ways:
On-premises private cloud: The hardware is in your building or in a datacenter you rent. You own the infrastructure and are responsible for managing it.
Hosted private cloud: The hardware is at an external provider, but is fully dedicated to your organisation. No shared servers, no other customers on the same hardware.
Private cloud gives you maximum control: over data location, security configuration, and what software runs. For sectors with strict compliance requirements (financial, healthcare, government), private cloud is often the only option that meets the requirements.
The price matches. Hardware, licenses, management: private cloud is structurally more expensive than public cloud. Unless you consume so much capacity that the public cloud bill exceeds the private cloud investment. Large organisations reach that point, but for SMBs it's rarely the case.
Public vs. Private Cloud: the key aspects
Hybrid cloud: the best of both worlds, if set up properly
Hybrid cloud combines a private environment with public cloud capacity. The idea: run what's stable and sensitive in the private environment, and use public cloud for peak loads, development environments, or less critical applications.
A concrete example: a retail company runs its CRM and order processing on a private cloud in a Dutch datacenter. The webshop front-end runs on public cloud, so it can scale effortlessly during peak moments (Black Friday). The two environments are connected via a secure link.
That sounds elegant, and it is when set up well. But hybrid cloud adds complexity. You're managing two environments. They need to communicate with each other. Data moving between environments needs to be secured. And your team needs to understand which workload runs where and why.
Organisations considering hybrid cloud without the corresponding architecture knowledge regularly make the mistake of underestimating the complexity and end up with the most expensive scenario: they pay for private cloud capacity they don't fully use, plus public cloud capacity they could have avoided.
Multi-cloud: a variant that deserves separate attention
Multi-cloud is not the same as hybrid cloud, but the terms are often used interchangeably. Multi-cloud means you use multiple public cloud providers. Not for redundancy, but for deliberate distribution: AWS for compute, Google Cloud for ML workloads, Azure because you use Microsoft 365 and the integration is convenient.
Multi-cloud can make sense to avoid vendor lock-in or to choose the best service per category. It also adds complexity: more providers, more invoices, more security configurations. Without a good cloud management platform (like Terraform or a FinOps tool), the bill grows faster than insight.
Which architecture fits which organisation?
There's no universally correct answer, but there are clear patterns.
Public cloud fits when: you want to start quickly, your IT team is small or non-existent, your workloads are variable (peak loads), or you have no special compliance requirements. For startups and growing companies, public cloud is the most logical first step.
Private cloud fits when: you process confidential or special personal data, you're in a regulated sector (healthcare, finance, government), you need consistent high performance without the variability of shared infrastructure, or you have specific data location requirements.
Hybrid cloud fits when: you already have a private environment and want to add peak capacity via public cloud, or when you can draw a clear line between sensitive and less sensitive workloads. The hybrid approach requires an architecture team or a managed service to handle the complexity.
Choosing cloud architecture: three scenarios
The Dutch context: data location and sovereignty
Dutch companies thinking about cloud architecture face an extra dimension: digital sovereignty. The GDPR stipulates that personal data of EU citizens cannot simply be transferred to third countries. The CLOUD Act enables American providers to request data from European servers. The Digital Markets Act and European Data Act add more regulation.
For most SMBs, the practical conclusion is simple: choose a provider that operates in the Netherlands or the EU, has no American parent company, and offers a clear data processing agreement. This doesn't necessarily exclude the large American hyperscalers, but it requires conscious choices in contracting.
For larger organisations or companies in regulated sectors, this is an architecture question. Which data can go in which cloud? How do you document those choices? And how do you maintain oversight as the cloud setup becomes more complex over time?
Wrapping up
Public, private, and hybrid cloud are three answers to the same question: how do you ensure your digital infrastructure is available, secure, and affordable? Which answer is right for you depends on your data, your team, your budget, and your risk tolerance. None of the three is inherently better. But a well-considered choice is always better than one that forces you into an expensive migration later.
Need help choosing the right cloud strategy? View our cloud solutions or request a free scan.